MightyBrand.com - helping you create a strong brand online

Three friends and I just launched a new blog called MightyBrand.com where we’re going to share tips, tools, and techniques that we’re learning and using to build strong brands online, as individuals, for clients, and for projects of our own.

We’ve just thrown up a slightly modified template and there’s not much in the way of content yet, but please check it out and let me know what you think.  We’ve got lots of quality content on the way, so stay tuned!

Oh, and we’re looking for guest bloggers as well, so if you have ideas for posts, please contact us at mightybrand at gmail dot com.  Thanks!

Projects launched in May 2008: 2 (1 client, 1 personal)

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

Comments

HowYouEco.com - First launch of May 2008

howyoueco.jpg

One of my clients launched HowYouEco.com today, which actually includes a suite of sites (HomeEco.com, WorkEco.com, PlayEco.com) and is directory project that helps people keep track of everything going on in the green movement. I got involved late in this project and mainly helped wrap up some loose ends and clean things up a bit. The site is pretty simple now, but they have some very cool plans for the future. Please take a look and let them know what you think!

Projects launched in May 2008: 1 (1 client, 0 personal)

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

Comments (1)

Is there a correlation between success and pissing people off?

I saw a post on Craigslist today that I’ve seen a few times for the last week or so on my feeds from around the country. Here’s the link:

http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lac/cpg/646621213.html

Anyway, there are numerous red flags in the post, such as:

  • looking for a “webmaster” (it’s 2008, not 1998)
  • focusing on cheap work
  • client has been “burned” (which MAY mean they are a bad client)
  • capitalization of “PhP” (could be a fluke, but still)
  • no explanation of what “inexpensive” means to them
  • general tone is a bit amateurish and naive

I went ahead and sent a quick response where I basically said that it was unreasonable to expect people to respond if they don’t know what your idea of “inexpensive” is, and that you can expect to pay $50 - 60 / hr at a minimum for someone really good.

This lady emails me back and berates me for my “rude” response, tells me that she was considering me for these other projects until now, tells me that she has lots of work and is always being asked to recommend people, etc. Basically that I have blown a huge opportunity by being honest with her. We went back and forth via email a few times, but in general, her position was that my email wasn’t polite enough, which is true. My email was abrupt and not at all polite, but I didn’t go out of my way to be rude to her either. I was simply stating the facts and trying to help out someone who, by her own admission, had been burned multiple times before. I explained to her that my clients pay very fair rates and expect (and get) great work in return. In return I’m very honest with them, rather than telling them what they want to hear. So far, the only jobs this behavior has cost me are the ones I don’t want in the first place. I’m a professional and I want to be hired by professionals, not amateurs who expect to hire a brilliant PHP developer with 5 years experience for $25 / hr.

This individual was also peddling the classic “do this one job for cheap and then there’s lots more high-paying work down the road” scam, for which I have trouble expressing my opinion without resorting to profanity. The bottom line is that this bridge is obviously burned, but I have trouble imagining a situation in which I’d want to cross that river anyway, so I won’t lose any sleep over it.

But it did get me to thinking about her general assertion that I should be more polite or it will cost me business. Now obviously, as professionals, we are required to act professionally and conduct ourselves in an ethical manner, maintain integrity, etc. But the question I have is: does building a strong personal brand mean that you’re not going to anger people, make enemies, etc? Or even more extreme, does it mean that you MUST make people angry, make enemies, etc?

I’m not entirely sure, but I see a lot of people that I admire who have no shortage of detractors and enemies and who are constantly stirring up storms of controversy. However, these people have very strong personal brands, very strong networks, and have experienced a great deal of success. Most importantly, they’ve actually gone out and accomplished something worthwhile. They’re not unprofessional, to the contrary: they’re ultra-professional. They’re not afraid to tell it how it is, regardless of whose feathers they ruffle, who gets upset, who finds it offensive. I think part of this is just the basic reality that disruptive technology, business models, and trends tend to upset those too attached to the status quo or those that feel they’re owed something by the system. When things change faster than they can adapt, they often point the finger of blame at those driving the change, rather than learning to thrive in a dynamic environment.

I think the bottom line for me is that making sure you don’t ruffle anyone’s feathers, make enemies, anger people, or stir up controversy is a good way to build a bland and boring personal brand, and you’re not likely to have a significant impact in your space. Yes, there’s always room for professionalism, integrity, and even a little tact, but the bottom line is that if you want to make an omelette, you have to break a few eggs.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

Comments (2)

The aggressive advancement of genomics

Interesting article about sequencing a person’s DNA and the advances in speed and cost. The Human Genome Project was the first team to successfully sequence a human being’s entire genome and cost roughly $3 billion, taking about 13 years to sequence one person’s DNA, finishing in 2003. Last year, researchers sequenced someone’s DNA for $1.5 million, and researchers are expecting $100 and a single workday within 5 years.

2003 - $3 billion

2007 - $1.5 million

2013 - $100

Putting time aside and focusing just on cost, this is something like a 2000-fold increase in performance from 2003 to 2007 and a 15000-fold increase from 2007 to 2013, assuming they get to $100.

Once you add time to the mix, the improvements are even more impressive. This kind of exponential improvement will drive similar advances in biotech and bioengineering. In 50 years, the world of biology and medicine will be fundamentally different from what it is today.

http://www.technologyreview.com/Biotech/20640/

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

Comments

Star Real Estate splash page up

I know a splash page isn’t much to get excited about, but I feel I owe readers an apology and some visual relief after posting a link to the previous version of Star’s site, so here’s our splash page. Our new site will be up soon…

http://www.StarSF.com

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

Comments

« Previous entries